One workspace.
Every customer
in context.

Manage Microsoft 365 posture, external assets and customer reviews together. Add operational security signals when your MSP needs them.

Customers / Cedarbridge GroupDemo data

Cedarbridge Group

3 assets · Microsoft 365 connected · last scan 18 Jun 2026, 09:15

Biggest risk: No DMARC policy in cedarbridge.example.

Microsoft 365
86

2 high · 3 medium · 2 low

External attack surface
71

2 high · 2 medium · 1 low

No changes since the last scan.

Fix these first

No DMARC policycedarbridge.example
High
No DMARC policycedarbridge-services.example
High
Microsoft Secure Score is lowcedarbridge-demo · Microsoft 365
High
Security defaults are off (and no replacement)cedarbridge-demo · Microsoft 365
High
Microsoft 365 DKIM is not enabledcedarbridge-services.example
Medium

Needs setup

Subdomain discovery: limited visibility. A lookup source was unavailable during the last run. 6 of 10 demo hosts checked.

Assets

AssetScoreFindingsMonitoring
cedarbridge-demoMicrosoft 365 tenant
867Daily
cedarbridge.exampleDomain · email & DNS
742Weekly
cedarbridge-services.exampleDomain · email & DNS
683Weekly

Customer context.
Not another silo.

Every managed customer has a dedicated workspace for tenants, domains, websites, findings, scan history and reports, scoped to your MSP organisation.

Explore MSP workflows
From your portfolio to a single asset.
Work across customers, then focus on the Microsoft tenant, domain or website behind a finding.
History that stays with the customer.
Review previous scans and prepare reports from the same customer context.
Access that follows your team.
Owner, admin, analyst, technician and viewer roles, with filters and saved views for day-to-day work.

From identity
to attack surface.

Microsoft 365 & Entra

Read-only assessments of connected tenants, with the permissions and licensing context kept visible.

Identity & access
MFA and privileged-role signals, Conditional Access and security defaults.
Tenant context
Guest access, Microsoft licensing and available assessment signals.
Secure Score & sync health
Track Microsoft Secure Score alongside assessment findings and source health.
Microsoft 365 posture

Identity & configuration

Havenwood Manufacturing · havenwood.example

Demo data
Administrator MFANeeds review
Conditional AccessPolicy found
Security defaultsAssessed
Guest accessReview recommended
Graph syncUp to date
Microsoft Graph accessRead only

Know what changed.
Keep reviews current.

Scheduled assessments, scan history and source health help your team follow changes between customer reviews.

Schedules, change detection & alerts
Monitor tenant and asset posture on a configured schedule. Route notifications by severity and event type to the right recipients.
Certificates & weekly risk digests
Track certificate expiry and receive a per-customer risk digest. CISA KEV exposure alerts flag relevant newly listed vulnerabilities.
Trends & forecasts
Use assessment history, drift awareness and the posture-score forecast to support follow-up.
Explore monitoring

Monitoring activity

Demo data
Havenwood Manufacturinghavenwood.example

Website assessment completed

Latest assessment available for review.

Certificate expiry approaching

portal.havenwood.example expires in 22 days.

Weekly risk digest ready

Customer risk summary prepared for review.

Scheduled website scan2 June · 09:30

Security posture reviews.
Ready for the conversation.

Customer-ready reports that connect the security score, priority risks and recommended actions. Executive context and technical evidence in the same review.

Priorities with clear next steps.
See the highest risks, recommended actions, severity and suggested timing.
Evidence behind each finding.
What we found, why it matters and what to do, with affected assets and assessment scope.
The score in context.
The same security score as the dashboard, with a 90-day trend. Incomplete assessments do not create a false-safe result.
Download PDF
SecurityScore.meDemo report · Fictional data

Security posture report

Briarfield Group3 March 2026 - 1 June 2026

72 FAIR
Monitored assets show gaps in services exposed to the internet and website security settings.

2 open findings · 1 asset monitored

Microsoft 365 not assessed.

Top 2 risks

High-risk service exposedremote.briarfield.example
Critical
Content-Security-Policy header missingbriarfield.example
Medium

Score trend, last 90 days

0204060801006472 3 March 20261 June 2026

One platform.
Distinct security workflows.

Posture findings remain in the assessment workflow. Security Operations, included for MSP organizations, brings operational alerts and vulnerability tasks into separate workflows, not a merged risk feed. Microsoft Defender and Entra signals need the customer’s licences and consent.

Posture findings

Configuration and control issues from Microsoft assessments and external checks.

Severity, evidence and recommendations, with rescans and history for follow-up.

Operational alerts

Microsoft Defender incidents and alerts, plus Entra risky-user and sign-in signals.

Acknowledge, assign, add notes, escalate and manage SLA follow-up. Availability depends on connected sources.

Critical CVE exposure

Detected technologies matched against NVD, CISA KEV and EPSS intelligence.

A separate exposure lifecycle with confidence, freshness and safe rescans. A match is not proof of exploitation.

Certificates & customer updates

A dedicated Certificates tab shows Certificate Transparency observations and upcoming expiry. Outbound updates support customer communication, without a customer portal.

Security Operations capabilities

Clear boundaries.
Visible data quality.

Missing or outdated source data should stay visible, not look like a clean security result.

Read-only Microsoft access
Assess with read permissions. No write-back or automatic remediation.
Approved assets only
Non-invasive external checks, SSRF protections and connect-only port probes. No exploit execution.
Your team stays in control
Organisation roles govern access. Your team reviews the evidence and implements changes.

Understand the state of each source.

Never synced
An initial successful sync has not completed.
Delayed or degraded
A source is behind its expected interval or returning incomplete data.
Permission or licence gaps
Required Microsoft access or licensing is unavailable.
Stale evidence
A fingerprint or assessment needs refreshing before exposure context can be trusted.

Before you connect.

Discuss your deployment
Is SecurityScore a SIEM, MDR or XDR service?

No. SecurityScore manages posture and includes an MSP-only Security Operations workspace. It is not a SIEM, MDR, XDR or ticketing platform.

Does an assessment make changes to a tenant?

No. Microsoft assessments use read-only access. Findings provide evidence and recommendations; your team decides and implements the changes. There is no automated remediation.

What happens when an assessment is incomplete?

The score uses the latest complete assessment for each monitored asset. An incomplete scan does not replace it. Assets without a complete assessment are shown as limited visibility and left out of the score. The score is a directional indicator, not a compliance certification.

Are reports fully white-labelled?

Reports are customer-ready and printable. Report PDFs and report emails can carry your brand name, your uploaded logo, one accent colour, footer text, your contact details and a disclaimer, and can hide the SecurityScore.me name. The dashboard itself is not rebranded, and there is no custom domain. The sample on this page uses fictional data.

Is monitoring immediate or guaranteed in real time?

Monitoring uses configured schedules and available source data. Source-health states show delays, degraded syncs and permission or licence gaps. The platform does not promise immediate detection.

See the platform
in your workflow.

Book your platform demo

Sample security posture report

PDF
SecurityScore.meDemo report · Fictional data

Security posture report

Briarfield Group

Prepared by Example Advisory · 3 March 2026 to 1 June 2026
Generated 1 June 2026 at 09:30

72 FAIR

Security score, the same as on the dashboard

Monitored assets show gaps in services exposed to the internet and website security settings.

No domain is monitored. Email authentication was checked only through the website scan (SPF and DMARC); DKIM, MTA-STS and the other mail checks were not run.

Score increased from 64 to 72 over this report period.

2 open findings: 1 critical and 1 medium. 1 asset monitored, last scan 1 June 2026.

Top 2 risks

High-risk service exposed

Critical

remote.briarfield.example

A remote desktop service reachable from the internet provides a possible entry point into the network.

Content-Security-Policy header missing

Medium

briarfield.example

A Content-Security-Policy limits the impact of a script injection flaw. This protection is missing from the assessed website.

Example Advisory · Briarfield Group1 / 5
SecurityScore.meDemo report · Fictional data

What to do first

Restrict Remote Desktop (3389) to approved access paths and networks.

Critical

High-risk service exposed · remote.briarfield.example · Immediate

Publish a Content-Security-Policy that matches the application dependencies. Check legitimate third-party assets before enforcement.

Medium

Content-Security-Policy header missing · briarfield.example · Within 30 days

Score trend, last 90 days

0204060801006472 3 March 20261 June 2026

First point 64 on 3 March 2026, last point 72 on 1 June 2026.

Example Advisory · Briarfield Group2 / 5
SecurityScore.meDemo report · Fictional data

Findings by area

2 open findings, grouped into 2 issues: the same issue on several assets is listed once.

Findings by area in the fictional customer assessment
AreaScoreAssessmentOpen findings
Website72Assessed1
Microsoft 365Not assessedNot assessed0
DNSIn Website scoreCovered by Website scan0
TLSIn Website scoreCovered by Website scan0
HTTP headersIn Website scoreCovered by Website scan1
IdentityNot assessedNot assessed0
Email securityIn Website scoreCovered by Website scan0
CookiesIn Website scoreCovered by Website scan0
CORSIn Website scoreCovered by Website scan0

Website 1 issue

Content-Security-Policy header missing

Medium

briarfield.example · Open since 22 May 2026

What we found

No Content-Security-Policy is enforced on this fictional website, reducing protection against content injection.

Why it matters

A Content-Security-Policy limits the impact of a script injection flaw. This protection is missing from the assessed website.

What to do

Publish a Content-Security-Policy that matches the application dependencies. Check legitimate third-party assets before enforcement.

Example Advisory · Briarfield Group3 / 5
SecurityScore.meDemo report · Fictional data

Exposed services and hosts 1 issue

High-risk service exposed

Critical

remote.briarfield.example · Open since 18 May 2026

What we found

The fictional host remote.briarfield.example exposes Remote Desktop (3389) to the internet.

Why it matters

A remote desktop service reachable from the internet provides a possible entry point into the network.

What to do

Restrict Remote Desktop (3389) to approved access paths and networks.

Assets

Monitored fictional assets
AssetTypeScoreLast scan
briarfield.exampleWebsite721 June 2026
Example Advisory · Briarfield Group4 / 5
SecurityScore.meDemo report · Fictional data

Appendix

How the score is calculated

The security score is the average of the latest complete assessment of each monitored asset, the same score as on the dashboard. An assessment that could not run every check (scan warnings, missing Microsoft 365 permissions) never counts: the asset's last complete assessment counts instead, and an asset without one is left out as limited visibility.

Score bands: Good from 80, Fair from 60, Poor from 40, Critical below 40. This is a directional indicator, not a compliance certification.

Scope and disclaimer

Assessed: external website and domain posture where registered, Microsoft 365 where connected, and the scheduled and manual scans of the report period. This report is informational and reflects point-in-time posture scans. It does not guarantee compliance with any framework or eliminate all security risk. This is not a penetration test and not a compliance certification.

Findings reflect externally observable posture and connected Microsoft 365 signals available to SecurityScore.me at generation time.

About this demonstration

All organisations, domains, scores, dates, assets and findings in this example are fictional. No customer environment was accessed or assessed to produce it.

Example Advisory · Briarfield Group5 / 5