Multi-customer posture management
- Problem
- Too many customer portals and spreadsheets.
- Outcome
- Portfolio-level visibility across managed customers in one MSP workspace.
Security workflows.
Built for MSP
service delivery.
Assess customer environments, prioritize findings, monitor change, and communicate clearly from one MSP workspace.
Built around how MSPs
deliver security services.
Each solution maps a practical problem to an outcome in SecurityScore.me, without merging posture, alerts, and CVE exposure into one workflow.
Microsoft 365 security reviews
- Problem
- Manual tenant reviews are slow and inconsistent.
- Outcome
- Repeatable read-only assessment and customer comparison. Availability depends on Microsoft licensing and granted read permissions.
External attack surface monitoring
- Problem
- Shadow subdomains, dangling DNS, forgotten open ports, and certificate sprawl go unseen between reviews.
- Outcome
- Passive subdomain and asset discovery, subdomain-takeover and exposed-service checks, web-app exposure probing, and Certificate Transparency monitoring per customer. Non-invasive, in the same workspace as Microsoft posture.
Domain and website security monitoring
- Problem
- DNS, email authentication, TLS, headers, and certificates are reviewed separately.
- Outcome
- Non-invasive external checks in the same customer context as Microsoft posture, including graded DMARC, DKIM key inspection, BIMI, MTA-STS, and certificate-expiry tracking.
Customer security reporting
- Problem
- Security findings are difficult to communicate.
- Outcome
- Customer-ready printable reports with prioritized recommendations for reviews and QBRs.
Security posture report
Briarfield Group3 March 2026 - 1 June 2026
Monitored assets show gaps in services exposed to the internet and website security settings.
2 open findings · 1 asset monitored
Microsoft 365 not assessed.
Top 2 risks
High-risk service exposedremote.briarfield.example
CriticalContent-Security-Policy header missingbriarfield.example
MediumScore trend, last 90 days
MSP Security Operations
- Problem
- Defender and Entra signals are hard to manage across many tenants.
- Outcome
- One MSP-only operational workspace. Customer communication is outbound and explicit. There is no customer incident portal, and this is not a ticketing system.
Critical CVE exposure review
- Problem
- Detected technologies are not automatically connected to current vulnerability intelligence.
- Outcome
- CVE exposure context from technology fingerprints and intelligence sources such as NVD, CISA KEV, and EPSS. Coverage depends on source health and activation, and is not assumed live for every deployment.
QBR and service delivery support
- Problem
- Customer conversations need clear posture history and priorities.
- Outcome
- Reports, history, posture changes, and prioritized findings support recurring reviews, without claiming compliance automation.
A clear basis for the next review.
- Reports & history
- Bring the customer’s security posture into the conversation.
- Posture changes
- Use changes in posture to guide recurring reviews.
- Prioritized findings
- Keep the discussion focused on the findings and recommendations.
Explore
SecurityScore.
View platformHow posture findings, alerts, and Critical CVE exposure fit together.
See featuresDetailed inventory of workspace, assessment, monitoring, and operations capabilities.
Request pricingConsultative pricing based on customers, tenants, and monitoring scope.
Request a demoBook a walkthrough of MSP workflows and reporting.
Ready to centralize
customer security posture?
Request a demo or explore how the platform layers fit together.